When Symbolism Bites: Implications of Snake At Government House

By Bello Mohammed
Abdullahi.

In a startling incident that blurred the lines between spectacle and governance, in my home town of Birnin Kebbi, the Capital of Kebbi State, North West Nigeria, a state government official recently attended a function at the Government House with a live snake coiled around his neck! The act, which sparked fear and chaos among attendees, has ignited a debate about accountability, public decorum, and the responsibilities of those in power. While his political party swiftly suspended him, the question lingers: Is disciplinary action by a political party sufficient to address such breaches of public trust?

Eyewitnesses described scenes of panic as the official entered the venue with the reptile, an act perceived as reckless and intimidating. Government functions, typically formal settings for policy discourse, became a stage for unintended theatrics. The official’s party responded by suspending him, citing a violation of “disciplinary norms.” Yet, this reaction feels incomplete, raising broader questions about consequences for public figures who prioritize shock value over solemn duty.

Beyond mere discomfort, the incident risks normalizing endangerment. While snakes may hold cultural or symbolic significance in some contexts, introducing a wild animal into a crowded space without consent breaches basic safety protocols. Legal experts argue that if local wildlife or public safety laws were violated, criminal charges—not just political penalties—should follow. Suspension alone sidesteps the state’s duty to enforce laws equally, even for those in power.

Public officials are custodians of trust. Their actions, however personal, reflect on their office and governance itself. The snake stunt—whether a misguided protest, attention-seeking, or cultural expression—undermines the gravity of public service. Ethical codes for public servants often emphasize dignity and restraint; violating these norms warrants scrutiny beyond partisan discipline. An independent ethics review could ensure accountability transcends political convenience.

Globally, similarly incidents reveal patterns. In 2018, a Ukrainian official wielded a grenade in parliament; he faced criminal charges. Conversely, symbolic acts like New Zealand’s lawmaker bringing a baby to parliament sparked debates but were deemed harmless. Context matters: when actions risk safety or erode trust, consequences must escalate. The party’s suspension, while prompt, risks appearing performative unless paired with systemic reforms to deter future breaches.

To restore credibility, measures must exceed suspensions:
1. Legal actions: Investigate potential violations of public safety laws.
2. Public Apology:
The official should acknowledge the harm caused.
3. Ethics Training: Mandatory programs for officials on decorum and responsibility.
4. Transparent Review: An independent panel to assess lapses and recommend safeguards.

Conclusion: Beyond Symbolism:
The snake incident is a microcosm of a larger issue: the erosion of respect for public institutions. While suspension is a start, true accountability requires legal, ethical, and cultural shifts. Officials must remember that their role is to serve, not to unsettle. As citizens demand integrity, governments must enforce consequences that match the gravity of transgressions—lest symbolism overshadow substance forever.

The lesson is clear:
In the halls of power, every act carries weight. When that weight becomes a serpent of discord, the response must be more than skin-deep.

Bello with email- _bellokeeto@yahoo.com writes from Kaduna.

Edited by Barth Ikiebe.