14.8 C
Monday, May 29, 2023
HomePoliticsAppointment of Minister of State, A Constitutional Aberration, Says Keyamo

Appointment of Minister of State, A Constitutional Aberration, Says Keyamo


Related stories

Wike Seals Hotel, Bar Belonging To Atiku’s Ally In Rivers

The outgone Governor of Rivers State, Nyesom Wike, in...

Tinubu, Shettima take the oath of office

The President-elect, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, has been administered with...

Tinubu : From Bourdillon To Aso Rock

By Nasir Onujabe "What God has signed no man reverses...

By Goodluck Ikiebe

The outgoing Minister of State for Labour and Employment, Festus Keyamo says it is an aberration to appoint a Minister of State.

He stated this while making a speech during a valedictory session chaired by President Muhammadu Buhari on Wednesday.

Citing some portions of the constitution, Keyamo, however, noted that his observation was not out of ingratitude but as his contribution to the nation’s constitutional development.

He said: “Mr. President, the concept or designation of ‘Minister of State’ is a constitutional aberration and is practically not working for many so appointed. Successive governments have come and gone and many, who were appointed as Ministers of State have not spoken out at a forum such as this because of the risk of sounding ungrateful to the Presidents, who appointed them. However, like I said earlier, this is not ingratitude.”

On the way forward, he said: “Many ministerial retreats have been held to try and resolve the issues between ministers and ministers of State.
President Obasanjo held four of such retreats, with the last one holding at the National Institute for Policy and Strategic Studies (NIPSS), Kuru, Jos, from 23rd to 25th February, 2001. Yet, the problems persisted.

“Mr. President, unknown to many, successive Presidents and the general public, these conflicts gravely affect the optimal performance of Governments. What is the way forward?

“Obviously, the argument that two Ministers are cramped into some ministries in order not to unnecessarily proliferate ministries and therefore save government’s money is no longer tenable. This is because government does not need any extra infrastructure or more money to maintain all Senior 36 Ministers or even a bit more appointed as is now the custom.

“This is because the present ministers and ministers of state have their separate offices, cars, security personnel and personal aides. So, what is the point?”

Latest stories



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here